Caroline Hulbert 5.27.19
Bio 10H Current Event 13
Wetsman, Nicole. “Here's Exactly How Restricting Abortion Harms Public Health.” Popular Science, 16 May 2019, www.popsci.com/restricting-abortion-public-health#page-2.
For this current event, I decided to review Nicole Wetsman’s article “Here's Exactly How Restricting Abortion Harms Public Health.” In this article, the author discusses how the recent laws passed by states such as Alabama and Georgia will have negative consequences to public health and safety. She starts by mentioning that abortions will become less safe as fewer clinics will mean women will begin having abortions later in their pregnancies, increasing their risk of complications, while currently, an average of only .75% of abortions have complications. Additionally, carrying a baby to term is much more risky than having an abortion, especially for women of color, who already experience more complications and higher risk of death from pregnancy. Wetsman concludes with the fact that unwanted pregnancies increase the risk of domestic violence and financial insecurity within households, noting that when women are unable to receive abortions, it can “tether them to violent men” and increase the amount of abuse they face.
I feel that this article is extremely relevant to the events currently occurring in our country. Abortion is an extremely controversial topic and the recent restrictions put in place by politicians has caused a lot of conflict between members of different political groups. I think that the points this article covers are very important when considering if these new laws are valid and that they should be looked into more.
I thought that this article was very well written and that the author did a good job including many statistics and specific pieces of evidence to support her argument and strengthen her writing. Aside from this, I think that she should have included arguments from lawmakers and and people who are in favor of abortion restrictions. Even though she does not necessarily agree with their opinions, including them would have made her article even more well written by including both sides of the abortion argument and appealing to a wider range of readers.