Tuesday, October 11, 2011

Global Warming:

http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/science/topics/globalwarming/index.html
         
          This article gives us an insight on what global warming is doing to our planet. In this article, the author speaks about how global warming is preventable because it is the men and women of society creating global warming by burning forests and creating greenhouse gases. Specific study was done on Cancun, Mexico to test the global warming issues on climate change. The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change is a group of people working to reduce the global warming. With the auspices, or the help of, the UNFCCC, in Cancun they are measuring the temperature change and working on the impact on the warming of the planet. The international debate is struggling with the difference between rich and poorer countries over who is going to pay to try and fix this global issue.
   
           The scientists studying global warming record temperatures consecutively to measure the change in temperature for a specific place. When the scientists recognize the global warming change in temperature they try to conclude what is causing this change. When they figure out what the problem is they talk the UNFCCC and the people of the community with global warming and tries to make a difference. Many people and their habitats are affected by global warming and it was important that people learn how to prevent this horrible climate changing issue. That is why many articles have been presented explaining what we can do to prevent the large amounts of pollution throughout the societies.
   
          Our current president, Barrack Obama promised as a candidate to have the United States put on a path to recognize the climate change by reducing emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gas pollutants. However when Obama presented to the issue of climate change to the congress they failed to act upon the major issue. When Obama rejected a proposed rule that the E.P.A. or the Environmental Protection Agency of the United States of America, that would have reduced a large amount of the ozone pollution. He rejected the proposal because it would cause an extreme burden on the industry and local governments in a time of economical distress.

No comments:

Post a Comment